تم تعطيل الجافا سكربت. للحصول على تجربة أفضل، الرجاء تمكين الجافا سكربت في المتصفح الخاص بك قبل المتابعة.

الرد على الموضوع

الرسالة: [QUOTE="فادي ك, post: 3837109, member: 118247"] وفي صفحة 346 يقول : [I][B]3. The Need to Discriminate[/B][/I] This problem is well illustrated in the apparatus of the UBS3 Greek New Testament, where for the most part the evidence was derived from the apparatuses of Tischendorf and von Soden.6 In this text for the first time, even though limited in its selection, the working scholar has available a handy, reliable list of Greek and versional evidence for most of the (translationally) significant variants in the NT. [B]But the patristic evidence in the majority of instances is either incomplete, ambiguous, or unreliable[/B]. [B]This evidence can neverbt implicitly trusted, as one can the Greek and versional evidence, and the close study of any of these passages always requires personal, firsthand analysis of the patristic data[/B].7 The problem, it must be quickly pointed out, is not the fault of the editors of the UBS text; rather, it is the result of a great lacuna in NT studies, namely, the collection and presentation of the NT text(s) used by the Greek Fathers,8 based on a careful analysis and evaluation of the available data. Hort himself lamented this problem over one hundred years ago:[B] "It is unsatisfactory that so much of the patristic testimony remains uncertain in the present state of knowledge; but such is the fact. Much of the uncertainty, though not all, will doubtless disappear when the Fathers have been carefully edited" [/B](1876: 5). It is the unfortunate reality of this science that over one hundred years later, the Alands can make a similar lament about the condition of this evidence, to the effect that the vast majority of work in this area still remains to be done[B] [/B] [/QUOTE]

التحقق