تم تعطيل الجافا سكربت. للحصول على تجربة أفضل، الرجاء تمكين الجافا سكربت في المتصفح الخاص بك قبل المتابعة.

الرد على الموضوع

الرسالة: [QUOTE="فادي ك, post: 3837108, member: 118247"] وفي ص 345 بأن علماء النقد النصي اعتبروا اقتباسات الآباء هي من الدرجة الثالثة : In NT textual criticism, patristic citations have ordinarily been viewed as [B]the third line of evidence[/B], after the Greek MSS and Early Versions. Along with the Early Versions, they are considered as indirect, or supplementary, evidence for the text of the NT,1 and[B] often therefore are also thought to be of tertiary importance. [/B]In fact, however, patristic evidence is often of primary importance ... [I][B]1. The Church Father and His Bible[/B][/I] [B]The problems created by the Fathers themselves and their citing habits are several, and are frequently noted.[/B] Basically, they cover four areas: [B]1. The question of copying or citing from memory[/B]. Did the Father cite Scripture by looking up the passage and copying his text or did he simply cite from memory? If, as appears to be most common, it was from memory, can his memory be trusted to reproduce the copy of Scripture he must have possessed? [B]2. The question of citing habits.[/B] The citing habits of the Fathers range from rather precise (e.g., Origen) to moderately careful (e.g., Eusebius) to notoriously slovenly (e.g., Epiphanius); therefore, the habits of each Father himself must be carefully studied before his citations can be fully useful. [B]3. The character/type of work involved. In many Fathers the care with which they cite varies from work to work.[/B]3 For the most part, they tend to be more accurate in commentaries and controversial treatises, the latter especially so if the meaning of the biblical text is involved; whereas they cannot necessarily be expected to be as precise in letters and sermons. [B]4. The number of Bibles used by the Father.[/B] It is perhaps presumptuous to assume that any Father, writing over a thirty- to forty-year period, had only one Bible; and perhaps it is folly even to assume he had only one Bible at any given time. After all, as early as Origen there is acknowledgment of many copies of Scripture. Furthermore, some Fathers tended to relocate from time to time (Irenaeus, Origen, Athanasius, Chrysostom),[B] so that they may not only have used different Bibles in a lifetime, but Bibles from different geographical centers with differing kinds of texts.[/B] [/QUOTE]

التحقق