تم تعطيل الجافا سكربت. للحصول على تجربة أفضل، الرجاء تمكين الجافا سكربت في المتصفح الخاص بك قبل المتابعة.

الرد على الموضوع

الرسالة: [QUOTE="apostle.paul, post: 3070201, member: 85886"] [COLOR="Black"][FONT="Arial Black"][SIZE="5"][FONT=Century Gothic][COLOR=Blue][B]ليه لا يصلح الكربون المشع فى حالتنا هذة للتأريخ [FONT=Book Antiqua] [/FONT][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][B][B][FONT=Book Antiqua]Carbon 14 and the Shroud of Turin[/FONT][/B][/B] [LEFT][B][FONT=Book Antiqua] [/FONT][/B] [B][FONT=Book Antiqua]The big issue was always the carbon 14 dating that seemed to show that the Shroud of Turin was medieval. [U][COLOR=Blue]Researchers, who were not experts in radiocarbon dating, but nonetheless convinced the Shroud of Turin was authentic, tried to explain why the scientific dating was incorrect. These explanations – one was that a fire in 1532 changed the age of the Shroud, another was that a bioplastic-polymer growing on the Shroud contaminated the sample – lacked scientific credibility. Scientists, who were experts in radiocarbon dating, rejected these explanations[/COLOR][/U]. [/FONT][/B][/LEFT] [B]فى يناير 2005 اكتشفوا ان العينة الىل عملوا عليها الكربون المشع لا تصلح وقال العالم ريموند روجرس ان كفن تورنتو اقدم من هذا بكثير على الاقل مرتين تأريخ الكربون المشع وربما 2000 سنة[/B] [LEFT][B][FONT=Book Antiqua]In January, 2005, things changed. An article appeared in a peer-reviewed scientific journal [I]Thermochimica Acta[/I], [U][COLOR=Blue]which proved that the carbon 14 dating of the Shroud of Turin was flawed because the sample used was invalid.[/COLOR][/U] [U][COLOR=Purple]Moreover, this article, by Raymond N. Rogers, a well-published chemist and a Fellow of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, explained why the Shroud of Turin was much older. The Shroud of Turin was at least twice as old as the radiocarbon date, and possibly 2000 years old. [/COLOR][/U][/FONT][/B] [U][COLOR=Purple][B][FONT=Book Antiqua] [/FONT][/B][/COLOR][/U] [RIGHT][B]واضافوا السبب فى خطا الكربون المشع [/B][LEFT][B][FONT=Book Antiqua][U][COLOR=Blue]The idea that the Shroud of Turin had been mended in the area from which the carbon 14 samples had been taken had been floating around for some time. But no one paid much attention. In 1998, Turin’s scientific adviser, Piero Savarino, suggested, “extraneous substances found on the samples and the presence of extraneous thread (left over from ‘invisible mending’ routinely carried on in the past on parts of the cloth in poor repair)” might have accounted for an error in the carbon 14 dating. [/COLOR][/U]Longtime shroud researchers Sue Benford and Joe Marino independently developed the same idea and explored it with several textile experts and Ronald Hatfield of the radiocarbon dating firm Beta Analytic. The art of invisible reweaving, Benford and Marino discovered, was commonly used in the Middle Ages to repair tapestries. Why not the shroud, they thought? They believed they saw evidence of it[/FONT][/B]. [/LEFT] . [/RIGHT] [/LEFT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

التحقق