تم تعطيل الجافا سكربت. للحصول على تجربة أفضل، الرجاء تمكين الجافا سكربت في المتصفح الخاص بك قبل المتابعة.

الرد على الموضوع

الرسالة: [QUOTE="apostle.paul, post: 3238336, member: 85886"] [COLOR="Black"][FONT="Arial Black"][SIZE="5"][FONT=Century Gothic][COLOR=Blue][B]شهادات الاباء الشرقيين عن كاتب الرسالة [/B][/COLOR][/FONT][B][FONT=Century Gothic][/FONT][/B][LEFT] [B][FONT=Century Gothic]This epistle was received as the production of Paul by the Eastern churches. Justin Martyr, who was born at Samaria, quotes it, about the year 140. It was found, as has been already remarked, in the Peshito—the old Syriac version, made in the early part of the second century. Jacob, bishop of Nisibis, also (about A.D. 325) repeatedly quotes it as the production of an apostle. Ephrem Syrus, or the Syrian, abundantly ascribes this epistle to Paul. He was the disciple of Jacob of Nisibis, and no man was better qualified to inform himself on this point than Ephrem. No man stands deservedly higher in the memory of the Eastern churches. After him, all the Syrian churches acknowledged the canonical authority of the epistle to the Hebrews. But the most important testimony of the Eastern church is that of Eusebius, bishop of Cesarea, in Palestine. He is the well-known historian of the church, and he took pains from all quarters to collect testimony in regard to the Books of ******ure. He says, “There are fourteen epistles of Paul, manifest and well known: but yet there are some who reject that to the Hebrews, alleging in behalf of their opinion, that it was not received by the church of Rome as a writing of Paul.” The testimony of Eusebius is particularly important. He had heard of the objection to its canonical authority. He had weighed that objection. Yet in view of the testimony in the case, he regarded it as the undoubted production of Paul. As such it was received in the churches in the East; and the fact which he mentions, that its genuineness had been disputed by the church of Rome, and that he specifies no other church, proves that it had [/FONT][/B][B][FONT=Century Gothic][I]not[/I] been called in question in the East. This seems to me to be sufficient testimony to settle this inquiry. The writers here referred to lived in the very country to which the epistle was evidently written, and their testimony is uniform. Justin Martyr was born in Samaria; Ephrem passed his life in Syria; Eusebius lived in Cesarea, and Origen passed the last twenty years of his life in Palestine. The churches there were unanimous in the opinion that this epistle was written by Paul, and their united testimony should settle the question. Indeed when their testimony is considered, it seems remarkable that the subject should have been regarded as doubtful by critics, or that it should have given rise to so much protracted investigation. I might add to the testimonies above referred to, the fact that the epistle was declared to be Paul’s by the following persons: Archelaus, bishop of Mesopotamia, about A. D. 300; Adamantius, about 330; Cyril, of Jerusalem, about 348; the Council of Laodicea, about 363; Epiphanius, about 368; Basil, 370; Gregory Nazianzen, 370; Chrysostom, 398, &c. &c. Why should not the testimony of such men and churches be admitted? What more clear or decided evidence could we wish in regard to any fact of ancient history? Would not such testimony be ample in regard to an anonymous oration of Cicero, or poem of Virgil or Horace? Are we not constantly acting on far feebler evidence in regard to the authorship of many productions of celebrated English writers ?[/FONT][/B][URL="http://www.arabchurch.com/forums/#_ftn1"][/URL][/LEFT] [URL="http://www.arabchurch.com/forums/#_ftnref1"][/URL] [COLOR=Blue][B]رسالة العبرانين استلمت بواسطة الكنائس الشرقية بانها انتاج بولس الرسول وذكر زمرة الاباء الشرقيين الذين شهدوا بذلك من اول القديس يوستين مرورا بيوسابيوس وكيرلس الاورشليمى وافراهام السريانى ويعقوب النيصبيصى ومجمع لاودكية وابيفانيوس وغريغوريوس النيزنزى ويحنا ذهبى الفم وارشيلاوس [/B][/COLOR] [FONT=Century Gothic][B]وختم وقال.......... لماذا لا نقبل شهادة هؤلاء الرجال والكنائس؟ ماذا نحتاج اكثر من هذا من ادلة اذا رغبنا ان ننظر فى حقيقة من حقائق العالم القديم ؟ واكمل وقال انا نعمل دائما على ادلة اضعف بكثير من هذا حتى الان فيما يتعلق بتحديد هوية كتابات مجهولة الكاتب [/B][/FONT] [FONT=Book Antiqua][COLOR=Blue][B]يعنى من الاخر ليه منقبلش كل دول للاقرار بهوية الكاتب واحنا الى يومنا هذا بيكون لدينا دليل ضعيف جدا وعلى اساسه بنحدد اسم كتاب مجهول فمبالك بكل هؤلاء الذين شهدوا لرسالة العبرانين من رجال قديسين وكنائس ومجامع وفى النهاية نقول ان الكاتب مجهول؟[/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

التحقق