تم تعطيل الجافا سكربت. للحصول على تجربة أفضل، الرجاء تمكين الجافا سكربت في المتصفح الخاص بك قبل المتابعة.

الرد على الموضوع

الرسالة: [QUOTE="Molka Molkan, post: 3248264, member: 79186"] [COLOR="Black"][FONT="Tahoma"][SIZE="4"][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4][COLOR=Black][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=4]معلش عزيزي حارس العقيدة، في شوية كلام عايز أحطهم في الموضوع هنا للذكرى.. [/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][CENTER][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=5][COLOR=Black][COLOR=Black][B][COLOR=Blue]..( [/COLOR][/B][COLOR=Red][B]19 [/B][COLOR=Blue][B])[/B][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][COLOR=Blue].. [/COLOR][LEFT] [LEFT]The meaning of this last assertion has nevertheless been disputed. It is plain how those who heard Him took it, and how, instead of expressing alarm and grief at so great a mistake, He confirms finally their interpretation. Schaff well shows the argument, which I can do no better than insert in this place. He says (Lange’s Commentary on John):—[/LEFT] [LEFT]“The neuter [FONT=Gentium]ἑν[/FONT] (one) denotes, according to the connection and for the purpose of the argument, unity of [I]will[/I] and [I]power;[/I] which rests on the unity of [I]essence[/I] or [I]nature:[/I] for power is one of the divine attributes, which are not outside of the divine essence, but constitute it. Even if we confine [FONT=Gentium]ἑν[/FONT] to dynamic unity, we have here one of the strongest arguments for the strict divinity of Christ. It is implied even more in [FONT=Gentium]ἐσμεν[/FONT] (we are) than in [FONT=Gentium]ἑν[/FONT]. No creature could possibly thus associate himself in one common plural with God Almighty without shocking blasphemy or downright madness. In this brief sentence we have, as Augustine and Bengel observe, a refutation both of Arianism and Sabellianism: [FONT=Gentium]ἑν[/FONT] refutes the former by asserting the dynamic (and, by implication, the essential) unity of the Father and the Son. ‘I and the Father’ and ‘we are’ refute the latter by asserting the personal distinction. Sabellianism would require the masculine [FONT=Gentium]είς[/FONT], instead of the neuter; and this would be inconsistent with ‘We are,’ and the self-conscious ‘I.’ ”[/LEFT] [SIZE=3]Grant, F. W. (1897). [I]The Numerical Bible: Being a Revised Translation of the Holy ******ures with Expository Notes: Arranged, Divided, and Briefly Characterized According to the Principles of their Nemerical Structure: The Gospels (Study Text)[/I] (551). Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers, Inc.[/SIZE] [/LEFT] [/CENTER] [/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

التحقق